The Higgs "Boson"

This article is poorly written and confusing but basically physicist found evidence of a creator that distinguishes how much matter is implemented into the universe. Its not 100 proven yet, but in the high 99%. All you atheists better re-think exactly how much you really know bc if there is a god, which physics can prove, you better repent.

Then religion is still wrong because it doesn't say "god is energy"

You're just changing the definition of "god" to fit the newly presented evidence

That brings us back to the original point of "religion changes so it doesn't have to lose"

It is unclear that it is exactly the boson Higgs foresaw, which by bestowing mass on other matter helps explain the way the universe was ordered after the chaos of Big Bang.

If you share any of the amazement of the great discoveries of science, this one will grab your attention. It's high-stakes either way: If the Higgs boson didn't appear, then particle physics couldn't explain why anything in the universe has mass -- a rather devastating shortcoming! On the other side, once we can detect signs of the Higgs field, we stand on the threshold of host of new discoveries about the fundamentals of physics.

When they announced the discovery of physics' most elusive particle this week, scientists didn't overreach. They just did damn good science. The fans and the foes of religion, by contrast, are overreaching on both sides. The quest for the Higgs boson, and its ultimate discovery, neither proves nor disproves God.

I could replace what u have in the quotation marks with old science theories previously known as "facts" and science could be just as "wrong"....adjusting definitions and theories due to new information doesn't make either science or religion inferior. They can both be "wrong"- were human beings after all ya know.

This article is poorly written and confusing but basically physicist found evidence of a creator that distinguishes how much matter is implemented into the universe. Its not 100 proven yet, but in the high 99%. All you atheists better re-think exactly how much you really know bc if there is a god, which physics can prove, you better repent.

It's more "religion changes so that it doesn't have to lose" than "religion wins" bro..

Religions say god created man in his image, not god created a particle that eventually created man

It's more "religion changes so that it doesn't have to lose" than "religion wins" bro..

Religions say god created man in his image, not god created a particle that eventually created man

^No you couldn't.

Science has very few things that are set in stone facts, it's made to change with new discoveries.

The Bible is supposed to be the infallible word of God, it's not made to change with new discoveries. If you try to change The Bible to fit these new discoveries, you invalidate The Bible as a whole because, as it says, it is the word of God and the word of God is correct.

If you change anything, you're either admitting that The Bible isn't really the word of God or that the word of God isn't correct; either way you're saying The Bible is wrong. If the book the religion gets it's foundation from is wrong, then the religion is wrong.

Maybe God is energy, and since humans are created out of energy and particles God did create us in his Image... God has manifested himself as a Burning Bush, a Bird and a few other inanimate objects...same for the devil...only way that's possible is if you were energy which can take on any form needed...


Again this proves nothing and Religion still wins...

Then religion is still wrong because it doesn't say "god is energy"

You're just changing the definition of "god" to fit the newly presented evidence

That brings us back to the original point of "religion changes so it doesn't have to lose"