Boxden hiphop sports wild'ish games movies news eyecandy tech gear rides
trending now most viewers #top20 top yesterday all sections videos pics tracks headlines

Mar 22 - COMPUTER CODE has been discovered embedded WITHIN the equations of superstring theory

most watched this minute | see more
most viewed right now
243 viewing
 Video inside So 15 Million streams later.. Drake Back2Back Is A Club Banger
89 comments
most viewed right now
146 viewing
 Video inside NYC Club Boo's When Meek Mill Gets Played In Club
30 comments

top in section
21 viewing
Video inside I told yall this day would come: Iron Man GTAV
top in games
top in section
101 viewing
 Image inside Would you fu-k Ronda Roussey?
top in eyecandy

people viewing this topic:   (0 members and 1 guests)  
 
 

let em know Share this on TwitterShare this on Facebook
 Mar 22 - COMPUTER CODE has been discovered embedded WITHIN the equations of superstring theory
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #181
kiddrocay 25 heat pts25 space
avatar space
fu*k Lupe, Boycott Lupe
space
$18,242 | POWERFUL
Perplexity said:
For those saying it's stupid for people to denounce god but believe a theory like simulated reality, not so fast.

I don't believe in god in any religious sense, not just ONE anyway. All this bloodshed and f!ghting over different gods is the main reason why. A good portion of the most popular religions state that only THEIR god is the right one, if you believe in another one you are deemed to an eternity of hell. That just doesn't sit right with me. If you are a true christian than you must believe that Allah is a lie, so you can denounce someone else's god but I can't denounce yours? See my point?

Christians who beef with atheists who don't believe in their god are the biggest hypocrites. A large part of Christianity is dismissing all other religions and all other gods, so you can do it but I can't?
obviously doesnt know what im talking about so he attacks me

energy can not be created nor destroyed, it can only be transferred so in order for anything to happen there has to be a preternatural source

so in essence of god not existing we dont exist because we were not created

god doesnt have to be a what the Christians say he is for all we know god can be some 2 dimensional energy source that was the catalyst for the big bang

nothing from nothing leads to nothing and enerygy doesnt come from nothing nor is it completely destroyed, something existing outside our universe is where it comes from

i


hey but leave it up to yall and we are fake

Last edited by kiddrocay; 03-23-2012 at 09:46 AM..
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '04 - away - #182
marcchrome 33 heat pts33 space
avatar space
R.I.P. Jay Dee
space
$9,667 | POWERFUL
ra1n said:
In order to understand what he's saying, you must have at least a basic understanding of String Theory.

Scientists have been trying to understand gravity at a microscopic level - trying to reconcile Einstein's General Relativity (gravity on a large scale) with Quantum Mechanics (behaviors of objects on a very small scale)

So, the leading theory worked on by scientists to try to understand how this works is String Theory a.k.a. The Theory of Everything

String Theory is a theory that postulates that our smallest known particles (subatomic particles) are made up of 1-dimensional "strings".

In other words, if String Theory is correct, at the smallest level - the universe is made up of vibrating strings.

The video is basically saying that scientists are baffled because some of the equations, drawn up in support of String Theory, reflect computer code.

(Remember: these equations are extremely complex, and only the brightest physicists/mathematicians can understand them.)

We must acknowledge that while the numbers may reflect reality - the implications drawn from them are purely in the realm of the theoretical.

String Theory also implies a bunch of other strange things like parallel universes, hidden dimensions, and an infinite amount of versions of you and me.

I recommend Brian Greene's documentaries if you're interested in more.

and for that exact reason is why astral projection and the sh*t you encounter on dmt and salvia is possible....... and why animals can see and hear on a different frequency.. there is sh*t going on around us and in the universe that we are not ready for. real talk.
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #183
kiddrocay 25 heat pts25 space
avatar space
fu*k Lupe, Boycott Lupe
space
$18,242 | POWERFUL
and good/evil forces exist

youd be a fool to think this is the only life and there is no such thing as good and evil, yall need to take a look around and also read up on some teachings from our ancestors of this planet
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #184
Ciggavelli 35 heat pts35 space
avatar space
The Compilation King
space
$1,875 | 20945076
illathruz said:
this is not true. i have studied string theory for years and have never once seen a postulate stating 1 + 1 = 3. I've seen a lot of misinformation in this thread but this is patently false and struck a chord within me.

if i am wrong, please shoot me a link showing where in string theory they say 1 + 1 = 3

Having different universes doesn't change the laws of math. its because the laws of math are so constant that infinite universes are possible.
Well, if we are a simulation, and simulations can be created in a wide variety of ways (after all, there are more simulations than actual organic life, right?), then someone can easily program a simulation where 1 + 1 = 3. Not a stretch at all...


illathruz said:
The elephant in the room that I haven't heard is that this paper was written in 2003 and since then, string theory and super-symmetry have come far due to the LHC at CERN.

Secondly, the esoteric nature of these ideas make it impossible for the layman here on boxden to refute off the cuff. I have read every comment in this thread and I am not sure if a single person actually read the paper. And I guess if your not going to read the paper, its unlikely you will read other scientists opinions on the paper.

So these two points lead me to an introduction of evidence that those reading this far into the thread may or may not find stimulating. It comes from Brian Greene, who was mentioned earlier in the thread, and from his book that was written in 2011. You know, when scientist say something they usually respond to each other. In the Hidden Reality, Brian Greene responds to Bostrom:

Nevertheless, Bostrom notes, the conclusion that we're in a simulation does not fully sever our grasp on the true underlying reality. Even if we believe that we're in a simulation, we can still identify one feature that the underlying reality definitely possess: it allows for realistic computer simulations. After all, according to our belief, we're in one. The unbridled skepticism generated by the suspicion that we're simulated aligns with that very knowledge and so fails to undermine it. While it was useful when we began to weigh anchor and declare the reality of all that seems real, it wasn't necessary. Logic alone can't ensure that we're not in a computer simulation. The only way to dodge the conclusion that we're likely living in a simulation is to leverage intrinsic weaknesses in the reasoning. Maybe sentience can't be simulated, full stop. pp 286 - 293

This was definitely a good post by the original poster. This is a question that has been thought about for years now, and I think will be thought about for a long time to come.

I don't think string theory has come far due to the LHC at CERN. Pretty much the exact opposite:








Perhaps you should read more...
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - on now - #185
vuser88 27 heat pts27 space
avatar space
WHITE BOY.
space
$1,868 | 16823154
illathruz said:
this is not true. i have studied string theory for years and have never once seen a postulate stating 1 + 1 = 3. I've seen a lot of misinformation in this thread but this is patently false and struck a chord within me.

if i am wrong, please shoot me a link showing where in string theory they say 1 + 1 = 3

Having different universes doesn't change the laws of math. its because the laws of math are so constant that infinite universes are possible.
might not apply to string theory but 1+1=0 (moduli addition)
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - away - #186
arqitekt 2 heat pts space
avatar space
fu*k Fame.
space
$787 | 3321164
my mothafu*kin god. this sh*t cray.




Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '05 - away - #187
Freemind 41 heat pts41 space
avatar space
Freemind10
space
$8,871 | POWERFUL
Tounw said:
But to think that "beings" could simulate this world as welll as our own videogame universe within our "reality" is mind boggling to say the least so then that would mean that the universe is apart of this program as well so wat are aliens?
they'd just be another simulation of life

I don't quite get the question, or the point to it.
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #188
Ciggavelli 35 heat pts35 space
avatar space
The Compilation King
space
$1,875 | 20945076
ra1n said:
^ @ciggaveli

he's talking strictly about String Theory / the laws of physics in this universe

you're talking about the simulation, in which of course, anything would be possible (different scientific laws in different universes)

Regarding the LHC,

There simply hasn't been enough time to find anything significant. You have to consider that scientists have to sift through an IMMENSE amount of data produced by the collider and compare it with the predictions made by their equations. It's gonna take some time.
Yeah, I was taking it a step further. I still think it applies though. String theory, at least as suggested by the scientist in this video, suggests that we live in a computer simulation. Computer simulations (which could also be considered universes) can be programmed to make 1 + 1 = 3. Thus, string theory may suggest that 1 + 1 = 3 somewhere

You're right about the LHC. We have certainly not had enough time to sift through everything. My point is that whoever said the LHC was confirming string theory was way off base. He was calling me out for misinforming individuals, when in fact he was the one doing that...hahaha

Last edited by Ciggavelli; 03-23-2012 at 10:19 AM..
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '04 - away - #189
shadow_boxer  space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$1,747 | 4956362
Freemind said:
some crazy a.ss sh*t.

basically what its saying is in the equations of string theory, which they're trying to use to describe the whole universe/nature itself if im not mistaken, you can find binary computer code... and not just random code, but a correcting code that was discovered in 1940 to make sure signals dont get mixed up and send the wrong message.

basically what that means, is we could possible not exist in the real universe... but it would be more likely that we are in a simulated universe... we exist on a super computer in the future. we think we exist because the artificial intelligence will be so good in the future it will be indistinguishable from actual conciseness. (this is what the 2nd guy was talking about, not the first guy who found the computer code.)

its a stretch yes, but it cannot be proven wrong.

and when you think about it further it could be true... everything we see, touch, smell, hear, taste all gets converted into electronic signals inside our body, and our brain turns these signals back into our surrounding... essentially you never can actually touch something, because its being turned into an electronic signal inside your body, and your brain projects the feeling of touch.

im kinda goin off topic now... but this stuff is just interesting to me.

i cant wait to see how we think about life and the universe in 10 year, 20 years, or even 30... the past 100 years has been crazy and its only speeding up

this is why I believe in God. And this also makes the movie the matrix make more sense I know I might have just contridicted my self but w/e.

Also I this could prove the people dont make things up when they hear sounds because those are signals and where are they coming from. And if we can make them up does that mean our mind can manifest other forms of matter?
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #190
kiddrocay 25 heat pts25 space
avatar space
fu*k Lupe, Boycott Lupe
space
$18,242 | POWERFUL
it k!lls me when people try to come at people and dont know the basics laws of our universe
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '08 - on now - #191
DUCE 139 heat pts139 space
avatar space
squasqua
space
$10,050 | POWERFUL
isnt m theory the new new now?



"In theoretical physics, M-theory is an extension of string theory in which 11 dimensions are identified. Because the dimensionality exceeds that of superstring theories in 10 dimensions, proponents believe that the 11-dimensional theory unites all five string theories (and supersedes them). Though a full description of the theory is not known, the low-entropy dynamics are known to be supergravity interacting with 2- and 5-dimensional membranes"

btw its completely plausible were all a simulation right now on some aliens computer
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #192
Ciggavelli 35 heat pts35 space
avatar space
The Compilation King
space
$1,875 | 20945076
I guess we're just not on the same page. We can program a simulation in OUR universe where 1 + 1= 3. What's the problem here?
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '09 - away - #193
JoEweSt316 5 heat pts space
avatar space
The ImmorTaL
space
$297 | 4561500
Jacc Blacc said:
i thought string theory was just that....a theory

and this is suppose to tell us that life is fake??? so if we k!ll ourselves what happens?? game over or re-do lol

True...the string theory is just that...a theory...we don't have the capacity to measure anything that small, so we can only guess that the entire universe is held together by these "strings".

Good guess though
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #194
Ciggavelli 35 heat pts35 space
avatar space
The Compilation King
space
$1,875 | 20945076
ra1n said:
who are you talking to?
Sorry I'm on my phone. I was talking to kiddrocay
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '07 - away - #195
Damagegadget 418 heat pts418 space
avatar space
TWERK KOBAIN
space
$26,600 | POWERFUL
here is what I question... is the code trying to correct string "theory"
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #196
Ciggavelli 35 heat pts35 space
avatar space
The Compilation King
space
$1,875 | 20945076
Ciggavelli said:
Sorry I'm on my phone. I was talking to kiddrocay
Sorry being on my phone is fu*king me up. I'm confusing people. Disregard my above comments. Oops... Sorry kiddocray
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '09 - on now - #197
JewsusChrist 182 heat pts182 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$16,660 | POWERFUL
what i got is that we are being simulated by people in the future? so they made us watch this video and thread so fu*k with us? like a tease
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '07 - away - #198
vegaspete27k 1 heat pts space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$959 | 3240408
our civilization is in its infancy stage
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '09 - on now - #199
JewsusChrist 182 heat pts182 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$16,660 | POWERFUL
its def aliens bros......just listen they are so fuking advanced in tech they actually simulated this world..think about it the mayans have interacted with aliens they were the gods. the aliens and the mayans came to an argument that they will control us for experimental reasoning. the aliens will self destruct us in december because they will be done with us. this is mind blowning
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '09 - on now - #200
JewsusChrist 182 heat pts182 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$16,660 | POWERFUL
but this is too crazy tho....did the people who slimuate us make HDTVS and 3D tvs? and do they pick whose in the NBA NFL ETC..........

Do they pick whose smart and not?

DID THEY PICK JESUS?????????????????????????
Reply With Quote
 

Home > all sections > BX Daily Bugle
  
    
          join bx


 




that hot ish yesterday


most viewed right now
98 viewing
Real or fake? The undertaker sues meek mill
156 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
48 viewing
Meek Mill - Wanna Know (Lyrics)
93 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
41 viewing
Celebrities react to Meek Mill's Wanna Know
324 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
31 viewing
Video inside IS THAT BEEF??? 50 Speaks on DRAKE vs MEEK MILL
29 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
30 viewing
Video inside Cassidy: Meek Mill's "Wanna Know" Was Trash
49 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
20 viewing
OT Ronda Rousey to the haters
79 comments
@sports
most viewed right now
12 viewing
Article inside Apparently Erykah Badu Is Not About That Life Says Azelia Banks
54 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
10 viewing
Audio inside Meek Mill - Wanna Know (Drake Diss) Explained Bar For Bar
63 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
9 viewing
Image inside Even Xbox is sh-tting on Meek
54 comments
@hiphop

^
contact us   |   bx@twitter   |   bx@facebook   |   privacy   |   search   |   BX 1998-end of time