Boxden hiphop sports wild'ish games movies news eyecandy tech gear rides
trending now most viewers #top20 top yesterday all sections videos pics tracks headlines

Jul 19 - Dozens of Genetically Modified Babies Already Born - How Will They Alter Human Species?

most watched this minute | see more
most viewed right now
242 viewing
 Image inside Paparazzi takes picture of Rozay when he first heard Back to Back
37 comments
most viewed right now
164 viewing
 Video inside The L's are inescapable for Meek, they clowning him IN CHURCH
48 comments

top in section
88 viewing
 Audio inside Dr. Dre - Compton: A Soundtrack by Dr. Dre (Official Discussion & Antic..
top in hiphop
top in section
27 viewing
 NFL 50% chance Trent Richardson makes the team
top in sports

people viewing this topic:   (0 members and 1 guests)  
 
 

let em know » Share this on TwitterShare this on Facebook
 Jul 19 - Dozens of Genetically Modified Babies Already Born - How Will They Alter Human Species?
Unread 3 years agoclass of '07 - away - #1
3289 pageviews
35 comments


Damagegadget 418 heat pts418 space
avatar space
TWERK KOBAIN
space
$26,600 | POWERFUL
By Dr. Mercola

When I first read that genetically modified humans have already been born, I could hardly believe it. However, further research into this story featured in the UK's Daily Mail1 proved it to be true. They've really done it... they've created humans that nature could never allow for, and it's anyone's guess as to what will happen next.

Even more shocking was the discovery that this is actually old news!

The Daily Mail article was not dated, and upon investigation, the experiments cited actually took place over a decade ago; the study announcing their successful birth was published in 20012.

While I typically comment on recent findings and health related news, in this case I will make an exception, because I think many of you may be as surprised by this information as I was. I do not propose to have any answers here as this is out of my scope of expertise.

At best, I hope I can stir you to ponder the implications of this type of genetic engineering, and I invite you to share your perspective in the vital votes' comment section below. As reported in the featured article:

"The disclosure that 30 healthy babies were born after a series of experiments in the United States provoked another furious debate about ethics... Fifteen of the children were born... as a result of one experimental program at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of St Barnabas in New Jersey.

The babies were born to women who had problems conceiving. Extra genes from a female donor were inserted into their eggs before they were fertilized in an attempt to enable them to conceive.

Genetic fingerprint tests on two one-year- old children confirm that they have inherited DNA from three adults—two women and one man."

Human Germline Now Altered... What Happens Next?
Today, these children are in their early teens, and while the original study claims that this was "the first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal healthy children," later reports put such claims of absolute success in dispute. Still, back in 2001, the authors seemed to think they had it all under control, stating:

"These are the first reported cases of germline mtDNA genetic modification which have led to the inheritance of two mtDNA populations in the children resulting from ooplasmic transplantation. These mtDNA fingerprints demonstrate that the transferred mitochondria can be replicated and maintained in the offspring, therefore being a genetic modification without potentially altering mitochondrial function."

It's relevant to understand that these children have inherited extra genes—that of TWO women and one man—and will be able to pass this extra set of genetic traits to their own offspring. One of the most shocking considerations here is that this was done—repeatedly—even though no one knows what the ramifications of having the genetic traits of three parents might be for the individual, or for their subsequent offspring.

Based on what I've learned about the genetic engineering of plants, I'm inclined to say the ramifications could potentially be vast, dire, and completely unexpected.

As a general, broad-strokes rule, it seems few scientists fond of gene-tinkering have a well-rounded or holistic view of living organisms, opting instead to view the human body as a machine. And as demonstrated with the multi-varied problems that have arisen from genetically engineered foods—from the development of superweeds and superpests, to the creation of a never-before-seen organism now linked to miscarriage and infertility—such a view is bound to lead you to the wrong conclusions...

Surprise, Surprise... "Unpredictable Outcomes" Reported
As it turns out, this type of genetic modification, called cytoplasmic transfer, is actually a hot topic among geneticists, but it's rarely published or discussed in the lay press, if at all—as evidenced by my own surprise when reading this decade-old piece of news.

Many follow-up reports continue to tout the high success of this method of treating infertility. But some, including a book put out by Cambridge Press, warns of the dangers and risks of this procedure. For example, the following excerpts from a report3 delivered during the 2003 World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology & Infertility in Berlin raises questions about the less than thoughtful implementation of this technology, and some of the problems encountered:

"... Cytoplasmic control of preimplantation development is not a "new" concept, but ooplasm transfer have been amazingly rapidly applied in humans, with relative success, in the absence of extensive research to evaluate the efficacy and the potential risks of the method, resulting in some publications highlighting the potential dangers (Winston and Hardy 2002, DeRycke et al 2002, Templeton 2002), and unpredictable outcomes (Cummins 2001, 2002).

... A frank follow-up of ooplasmic transplantation pregnancies and infants reports that two out of 17 fetuses had an abnormal 45, XO karyotype. The authors a.ssume the hypothesis of a link between chromosomal anomalies and oocytes manipulation, and reveal that one of the babies has been diagnosed at 18 months with Pervasive Developmental Disorder, a spectrum of autism-related diagnoses." [Emphasis mine]

So it didn't take long—less than two years, in fact—for reports of "unpredictable outcomes" to crop up. I for one am not surprised. It's somewhat disconcerting that so much of this research is taking place without open discussion about the ethical questions a.ssociated with it.

The US FDA appears to have begun looking at the ethics of ooplasmic transplantation, and in one powerpoint4 it is pointed out that an 18-month-old child born from this procedure has been diagnosed with autism (PDD), and that the incidence of chromosomal anomalies is known to be higher in children born from the procedure than the rate of major congenital abnormalities observed in the natural population.

The document also states that lack of testing and long-term follow-up of the children born from the procedure so far is a significant shortcoming, making evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the technique very difficult. The genetic modification of humans appears to have been running alongside the genetic engineering of plants, being just a few years behind in terms of the technology being unleashed, and the lack of proper evaluation of health effects is apparently on par as well, which is to say near non-existent...

Could They Create Patentable Humans? Perhaps...
Another horrific side effect that has nothing to do with health per se, is the potential that making this procedure widely available may trigger a "patent" war; meaning these genetically modified humans could become patentable property.

Sound crazy?

You bet! But it's not outside the realm of possibility. The world is already embroiled in discussions about which genetically engineered life forms can and cannot be patented5, and biotech companies have secured patents on everything from genetically modified seeds to engineered animals of various kinds. Even human genes have already been patented!

As explained by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)6:

"The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) grants patents on human genes, which means that the patent holders own the exclusive rights to those genetic sequences, their usage, and their chemical composition. Anyone who makes or uses a patented gene without permission of the patent holder – whether it be for commercial or noncommercial purposes – is committing patent infringement and can be sued by the patent holder for such infringement. Gene patents, like other patents, are granted for 20 years.

For example, Myriad Genetics, a private biotechnology company based in Utah, controls patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes [two genes a.ssociated with hereditary brea$t- and ovarian cancer]. Because of its patents, Myriad has the right to prevent anyone else from testing, studying, or even looking at these genes. It also holds the exclusive rights to any mutations along those genes. No one is allowed to do anything with the BRCA genes without Myriad's permission.

A 2005 study found that 4,382 of the 23,688 human genes in the National Center for Biotechnology Information's gene database are explicitly claimed as intellectual property. This means that nearly 20% of human genes are patented. In addition to the BRCA genes, genes a.ssociated with numerous diseases, both common and rare, are patented, including Alzheimer's disease, asthma, some forms of colon cancer, Canavan disease, hemochromatosis, some forms of muscular dystrophy, Long QT Syndrome, and many others."

If this sounds outrageous, illegal, and nonsensical, it's because it's all of those things. The ACLU claims to be engaged in a noble lawsuit against the US Patent and Trademark Office to stop the practice of issuing patents that are contrary to the law, which states only inventions can be patented—not naturally occurring parts of the human body. Still, the precedent has been clearly set. So what's to stop a company from eventually claiming patent rights on an entire individual?

Human Cloning Next?
According to the featured article7, "altering the human germline—in effect tinkering with the very make-up of our species—is a technique shunned by the vast majority of the world's scientists. Geneticists fear that one day this method could be used to create new races of humans with extra, desired characteristics such as strength or high intelligence."

But that's clearly not the end of the line in terms of where this technology might lead, if it hasn't already:

"... Jacques Cohen is regarded as a brilliant but controversial scientist who has pushed the boundaries of a.ssisted reproduction technologies," Mail Online states8. "He developed a technique which allows infertile men to have their own children, by injecting sperm DNA straight into the egg in the lab. Prior to this, only infertile women were able to conceive using IVF.

Last year [2000], Professor Cohen said that his expertise would allow him to clone children—a prospect treated with horror by the mainstream scientific community. 'It would be an afternoon's work for one of my students,' he said, adding that he had been approached by 'at least three' individuals wishing to create a cloned child, but had turned down their requests."

That was then—12 years ago. One can only guess what might have transpired in laboratories such as that of Professor Cohen since then...
Will these Genetically Modified Babies Alter Human Species?
Reply With Quote
Props given to Damagegadget hot topic  (07-19-2012)

35 comments for "Jul 19 - Dozens of Genetically Modified Babies Already Born - How Will They Alter Human Species?"

- To post a comment, join the squad -


Unread 3 years agoclass of '12 - away - #2
endless lies 12 heat pts12 space
avatar space
Mossad Agent
space
$1,553 | 0

[pic - click to view]

Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - on now - #3
Tony Franks 3 heat pts space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$6,121 | POWERFUL
endless lies said:

[pic - click to view]

Lol, I hope so. Make life a bit more interesting.
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - away - #4
ahenson 55 heat pts55 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$1,064 | POWERFUL
Even more shocking was the discovery that this is actually old news!

Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '07 - away - #5
Damagegadget 418 heat pts418 space
avatar space
TWERK KOBAIN
space
$26,600 | POWERFUL
ahenson said:
Even more shocking was the discovery that this is actually old news!

Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '09 - away - #6
ManWithoutFear! 2 heat pts space
avatar space
If it wasnt 4 Da Bronx...
space
$9,189 | POWERFUL
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '04 - away - #7
ItAlY2BkLyN 231 heat pts231 space
avatar space
Mile Hi State of Mind
space
$17,628 | POWERFUL

[pic - click to view]

Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #8
Delbert Mengel 28 heat pts28 space
avatar space
S.L.A.B.-ed
space
$20,147 | POWERFUL
The Daily Mail article was not dated, and upon investigation, the experiments cited actually took place over a decade ago; the study announcing their successful birth was published in 20012.

it's from the future then
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '07 - away - #9
Damagegadget 418 heat pts418 space
avatar space
TWERK KOBAIN
space
$26,600 | POWERFUL
DelbertMengel said:
The Daily Mail article was not dated, and upon investigation, the experiments cited actually took place over a decade ago; the study announcing their successful birth was published in 20012.

it's from the future then
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '08 - away - #10
Nut-In-Honeys 9 heat pts space
avatar space
The Closer of Threads
space
$4,661 | POWERFUL
Test tube baby


[pic - click to view]

Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '05 - away - #11
Freemind 41 heat pts41 space
avatar space
Freemind10
space
$8,871 | POWERFUL
Not the genetic modification i was expecting.

Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - on now - #12
0ddJoB 66 heat pts66 space
avatar space
n*ggasRespectMyPinkRims
space
$19,831 | POWERFUL
ofc its already happened... wtf

pisses me off
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '12 - away - #13
Twelve  space
avatar space
Señior Member
space
$1,750 | 9929888
Genetic fingerprint tests on two one-year- old children confirm that they have inherited DNA from three adults—two women and one man."
That's the lamest super genetically altered power ever. It's right up there with those sparklers sh*ts Jubilee shoots out of her hands.
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '10 - away - #14
kwmvp12 2 heat pts space
avatar space
Member
space
$76 | 1053684
Well goodbye sports!!! Unless they make a league just for these damn things
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '07 - away - #15
Bruce Leeroy  space
avatar space
When you got that glow..
space
$15,622 | POWERFUL
swayze said:
Been going on since Louise Brown in the 70's . No wonder there's so many idiots and freakishly stupid people now a days. Lets not forget the space nuts who believe things they've never seen.
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - away - #16
case sensitive  space
avatar space
6 in your area
space
$3,386 | 8944810
DelbertMengel said:
The Daily Mail article was not dated, and upon investigation, the experiments cited actually took place over a decade ago; the study announcing their successful birth was published in 20012.

it's from the future then





them altered babies went back in time from the future to let us know
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - away - #17
UrbanGAAWD 199 heat pts199 space
avatar space
THOT LUVR
space
$6,988 | POWERFUL
Why do you think celebrities are always going to "fretility clinic"... JLo, Britney spears, Beyonce, Khloe Kardashian and etc...they go in and take the mans sperm and woman's eggs and try to remove any unsavory genes like fat or baldness etc....idk how deep it goes but they can deny those heredity genes from forming in babies...sh*ts crazy
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - away - #18
TeddiGramz 1 heat pts space
avatar space
Kevin White
space
$7,430 | POWERFUL

[video - click to view]

Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '12 - away - #19
SwizZy 73 heat pts73 space
avatar space
Real Eyes Realize
space
$2,398 | POWERFUL
swayze said:
Been going on since Louise Brown in the 70's . No wonder there's so many idiots and freakishly stupid people now a days. Lets not forget the space nuts who believe things they've never seen.
Reply With Quote
Unread 3 years agoclass of '11 - away - #20
illprem 7 heat pts space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$1,060 | 8121031
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) grants patents on human genes, which means that the patent holders own the exclusive rights to those genetic sequences, their usage, and their chemical composition. Anyone who makes or uses a patented gene without permission of the patent holder – whether it be for commercial or noncommercial purposes – is committing patent infringement and can be sued by the patent holder for such infringement. Gene patents, like other patents, are granted for 20 years.

For example, Myriad Genetics, a private biotechnology company based in Utah, controls patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes [two genes a.ssociated with hereditary brea$t- and ovarian cancer]. Because of its patents, Myriad has the right to prevent anyone else from testing, studying, or even looking at these genes. It also holds the exclusive rights to any mutations along those genes. No one is allowed to do anything with the BRCA genes without Myriad's permission.

A 2005 study found that 4,382 of the 23,688 human genes in the National Center for Biotechnology Information's gene database are explicitly claimed as intellectual property. This means that nearly 20% of human genes are patented.

This is fu*king disgusting
Reply With Quote
 

Home > all sections > BX Daily Bugle
  
    
          join bx


 




that hot ish yesterday


most viewed right now
101 viewing
Well damn, Potent dj drama/meek/drake tea via lipstickalley
430 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
65 viewing
NBA RIP to Stanley Johnson mom
68 comments
@sports
most viewed right now
60 viewing
Image inside OVOFest The Official Potential Meek Mill Burial Anticipation Thread 8/..
81 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
33 viewing
Image inside Kylita Jimenez looking right in these pics
41 comments
@eyecandy
most viewed right now
30 viewing
Image inside Meek Mill Fan Leaves The Realest Comment About His Beef With Drake On ..
225 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
28 viewing
Video inside She Went Off: Mom Catches Her 14 Year Old Daughter With A 21 Year Old!
96 comments
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
26 viewing
Image inside I might let your boy chauffeur me. But he gotta eat the booty like gro..
40 comments
@eyecandy
most viewed right now
25 viewing
Real Talk If Meek The Realst One In The Beef , Why He Catching So Much Hate....
167 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
14 viewing
Article inside ‘Straight Outta Compton’ Reviews Are In, ’The Avengers’ Of Rap Biopics
115 comments
@movies

^
contact us   |   bx@twitter   |   bx@facebook   |   privacy   |   search   |  © BX 1998-end of time