Jul 15 - US readies robot 'surge' in Iraq to go along with ground troops
|Jul 15 - US readies robot 'surge' in Iraq to go along with ground troops|
|Latest News Hot Topics »||share this topic »|| |
|07-15-2007, 11:42 PM||away - #2|
we on some other !!....we embarrassing that country. if you start using robots to b0mb ma !!ers your doing experiments and !!. and you should let all our soldiers come home.
|07-16-2007, 06:35 AM||away - #3|
das sum terminator ish
|07-16-2007, 07:01 AM||away - #4|
IF YOU CANT BEAT EM, SIGN EM UP
|07-16-2007, 08:05 AM||away - #5|
lol the terminator era has begun.
$20 that they start b0mbing the wrong homes
|07-16-2007, 08:31 AM||away - #6|
haha they gonna get sonned from Nevada...that ish is crazy
|07-16-2007, 09:04 AM||away - #7|
That's exactly what they're doing and that's exactly what thay said they were gonna do.
However, this transition period must be a first step toward more substantial reform. Over the next several decades, the United States must field a global system of missile defenses, divine ways to control the new “international commons” of space and cyberspace, and build new kinds of conventional forces for different strategic challenges and a new technological environment.
Not only are they talking about testing new weapons technologies, they are also talking about "controlling" space and the internet.
The fourth element in American force posture – and certainly the one which holds the key to any longer-term hopes to extend the current Pax Americana – is the mission to transform U.S. military forces to meet new geopolitical and technological challenges.
This transformation is nothing more than adopting the Wolfowitz doctrine which is the unconstitutional policy of pre-emptive strikes. If there ever was such a thing as a demon, Wolfowitz would be the closest thing.
Moreover, the process of transformation should proceed in a spirit of competition among the services and between service and joint approaches. Inevitably, new technologies may create the need for entirely new military organizations; this report will argue below that the emergence of space as a key theater of war suggests forcefully that, in time, it may be wise to create a separate “space service.”
Only recently has Bush began speaking publicly about using space for a military program. This was published in 2000.
...Thus, it can be foreseen that the process of transformation will in fact be a two-stage process: first of transition, then of more thoroughgoing transformation. The breakpoint will come when a preponderance of new weapons systems begins to enter service, perhaps when, for example, unmanned aerial vehicles begin to be as numerous as manned aircraft. In this regard, the Pentagon should be very wary of making large investments in new programs – tanks, planes, aircraft carriers, for example – that would commit U.S. forces to current paradigms of warfare for many decades to come.
There you have it... over 7 years ago, they planned this whole !!. It's not about freedom, or terrorism, or WMDs. It's about new weapons to fight new wars that were designed by these few men. They also have direct financial ties to the private corporations that manufacture and sell these weapons, and to allow them to also write or even "suggest" foreign policy is ludicrous and is the epitome of corruption.
By the way, this document also touches slightly on the NAU on Page 14:
Across the globe, the trend is for a larger U.S. security perimeter, bringing with it new kinds of missions.
Larger U.S. security perimeter. This is the exact language used in the CFR document, "Building a North American Community. - A known ultra - "Liberal" think tank. The Project For a New American Century is in contrast, a known ultra - "Conservative" think tank. When these two allegedly "opposing" groups begin saying the same things, watch out!
These !!s publish all their plans YEARS and sometimes DECADES before they execute them or even talk about it publicly. If more people would actually READ their publications, i.e.-"know your enemy", we'd all be in a better position to stop them from bull!!tin us.
|07-16-2007, 09:09 AM||away - #8|
... And by the way...
...Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
New Pearl Harbor = 9/11/01
| Had A Spark When You Started, Now You Just Garbage |
New reply 45 seconds ago - 124 comments - by HDBeatz
| Who's That Next To Beyonce? |
New reply 1 hour ago - 70 comments - by I-NeeD-$$$
| Foxy Brown I Never Said Jay-z Was A 'tranny Chaser' |
New reply 29 minutes ago - 51 comments - by ice wolf
| Lawd Half Mercy... |
New reply 2 hours ago - 62 comments - by Tsunami Ray
| NBA Could Nate Thurmond Be Lebrons Daddy (pic) |
New reply 39 minutes ago - 107 comments - by michaelc107
| May 23 - Wtf?! 2 Fbi Agents Involved In Dzhokhar Tsarn... |
New reply 2 hours ago - 55 comments - by Trilluminati GA
| NBA Tim Duncan's Wife Wins The Mega Millions |
New reply 50 minutes ago - 72 comments - by Dee Grande
| Fan Gets Chief Keef’s Face Tatted On Her Back |
New reply 3 hours ago - 68 comments - by Dashawn38
|Join us on Facebook. Check out the BX fan page and hit the Like button.||Follow BX on Twitter to get instant hot topic alerts.||Enter your email address below and receive a daily hot topic newsletter.|
|5,316 fans of BX | none new today||4,299 following | none new today|