Jan 12 - CNN's Anderson Cooper Calls Claims Of Sandy Hook Shooting Being A False Flag Attack Absurd

If you'll remember, earlier this week I mentioned James Tracy, the professor at Florida Atlantic University who claimed the Sandy Hook shooting was staged. Among other things, he claims that the shooting was staged by "crisis actors" employed by the White House in an effort to make it easier to push for gun control. Angry Mouse mentioned this as well.

Last night, Anderson Cooper took on Tracy and several other conspiracy theorists who have cropped up.

Apparently Tracy's claims are among the saner ones that have popped up--at least by the standards of conspiracy theories. For instance, one theory claims that Emilie Parker, one of the victims, isn't really dead because her sister was seen sitting on President Obama's lap wearing the same dress Emilie wore in a family picture. Another suggests that Noah Posner isn't really dead because his mother wasn't crying her eyes out when Cooper interviewed her on December 21.

Tracy apparently showed his true colors when he refused to appear on air last night. He did, however, email a statement to CNN which he reproduced on his blog. He apologized for any anguish his posts may have caused, but claimed any anguish that they may have caused was solely due to the mainstream press taking them out of context. This coming from a guy who actually had the nerve to write that the victims' families haven't been subjected to enough public scrutiny.

Cooper seemed particularly disgusted that Tracy is putting this out while working at a state university that gets taxpayer money. As d|sgusting as Tracy's sentiments are, they don't come close to being cause for yanking his tenure. About the only way I could see him losing his tenure is if he actually encouraged his students to get in touch with the families and try to get them on the record. For now, this guy only deserves to be held up for public ridicule.

Before anyone wonders, Tracy is supposedly on our side. He's a frequent contributor to the Center for Global Research, the leftie version of WorldNutDaily.

AC is a !!ing media shill and rumored (former) CIA agent, but I won't go into that as I do not know much of that rumor.

Either way, he ain't supposed to co-sign the FAU professor. His job was to make a fool of him and attempt to destroy credibility.

No way shape or form would the media let that professor have enough time to speak and provide what he feels is evidence to back his claims. All the media does is make a mockery out of niccas.

IF THE !! WAS REAL PLEASE REFUTE THE VIDS ON YOUTUBE THEN....SUCH AS THESE:

AC is a !!ing media shill and rumored (former) CIA agent, but I won't go into that as I do not know much of that rumor.

Either way, he ain't supposed to co-sign the FAU professor. His job was to make a fool of him and attempt to destroy credibility.

No way shape or form would the media let that professor have enough time to speak and provide what he feels is evidence to back his claims. All the media does is make a mockery out of niccas.

IF THE !! WAS REAL PLEASE REFUTE THE VIDS ON YOUTUBE THEN....SUCH AS THESE:







AND ALL THE VIDS ON THE SIDE UNDER "RELATED"

NOTE THAT REFUTE DOES NOT MEAN "MAKE A MOCKERY" OR "ASK STUPID QUESTIONS LIKE WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THEM DOING THIS"

People be quick to jump on the bash the "conspiracy theorist" bandwagon, and I'm not speaking up for them but I just call it how I see it. How do you see evidence such as this:

[pic]

And just turn the other cheek like its a coincidence??

It's like you cats want to label everybody that questions things that don't make any sense.. [pic]

Are you foreal with this photo? Pics like this, is one of the reasons why people do not take conspiracy theorist serious. Crackpots creating photos, with crayola writing all over them.

People be quick to jump on the bash the "conspiracy theorist" bandwagon, and I'm not speaking up for them but I just call it how I see it. How do you see evidence such as this:

[pic]

And just turn the other cheek like its a coincidence??

It's like you cats want to label everybody that questions things that don't make any sense.. [pic]

thats clearly not the same woman. as far as the little girl on obama's lap its pretty obvious thats her sister.

i think its hilarious that we think the government would go thru the trouble to fake this !! but be so !!ing terrible at it. u think if they were setting up these shootings that receive national attention they wouldnt be able to get multiple actresses to play roles? they just get ol jill to play the attorney and the mother. or that no one realized that "o hey....emilie cant sit on obama's lap....she supposed to be dead". gtfoh with that silly !!.

People be quick to jump on the bash the "conspiracy theorist" bandwagon, and I'm not speaking up for them but I just call it how I see it. How do you see evidence such as this:

[pic]

And just turn the other cheek like its a coincidence??

It's like you cats want to label everybody that questions things that don't make any sense.. [pic]

[pic]

Right click and open image in a new page, full-size.. It's obviously the same lady. And they don't have to worry about being terrible at faking anything, as this site proves, most of America doesn't have the brain capacity to decipher what's going on.