Boxden hiphop sports wild'ish games movies news eyecandy tech gear rides
trending now popular now #top20 top yesterday all sections videos pics tracks headlines

Jan 10 - VP Biden: Obama May Use ‘Executive Orders’ to Crack Down on Guns

most watched this minute | see more
most viewed right now
253 viewing
Image inside The Clinton Body Count  
60 comments
most viewed right now
98 viewing
 Image inside Augusta native Cortez Berry is NOT enjoying his st..
24 comments

top in section
65 viewing
Article inside Katy Perry asked that the trash be removed from the ..
top in hiphop
top in section
45 viewing
 Image inside Afro Perm: Asian People With Kinky Hairstyles
top in wild'ish

people viewing this topic:   (0 members and 1 guests)  
 
 

let em know » Share this on TwitterShare this on Facebook
 Jan 10 - VP Biden: Obama May Use ‘Executive Orders’ to Crack Down on Guns
Unread 01-10-2013, 11:56 AMJoined Nov 2006 - away - #1
2183 pageviews
51 comments


KFrizzle 285 heat pts285 space
avatar space
#JayCutlerSucks
space
$5,766 | POWERFUL
Vice President Joe Biden addressed the ongoing discussion and debate surrounding gun control. Rather than relying strictly upon the legislative process, he said that Obama “is going to act” — and potentially without Congress’ blessing.

Before meeting with gun safety and victims’ groups, the vice president told reporters that “executive orders” may be an avenue that the administration will use to take swift action on firearms.

“There are executives orders, there’s executive action that can be taken,” he said. “We haven’t decided what that is yet. But we’re compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required.”

As the Weekly Standard notes, Biden stressed the importance, in his view, of taking action to curb gun violence. He also said that he is convinced that the government “can affect the well-being of millions of Americans and take thousands of people out of harm’s way” — pending officials “act responsibly.”

Even if Obama attempts to take unilateral action, Biden indicated that legislation is still “required.”

Watch the vice president’s comments, below:



http://www.theblaze.com/s...-down-on-guns/
__________________________________________________

This would be a very unwise move... image
Reply With Quote
The Following BX resident gave props to KFrizzle (Sent To 9,442 Subscribers)  HOT TOPIC  (01-10-2013)

51 comments for "Jan 10 - VP Biden: Obama May Use ‘Executive Orders’ to Crack Down on Guns"

- To post a comment, join the squad -


Unread 01-10-2013, 12:03 PMJoined Feb 2006 - away - #2
killya 17 heat pts17 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$3,952 | 19814040
get ready America, they coming.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 12:05 PMJoined Jan 2005 - away - #3
Based_One 62 heat pts62 space
avatar space
Casual BX Poster
space
$7,499 | POWERFUL
Yes I hate all the gun crime that has been going on lately however what is taking guns away from law abiding citizens going to do when crazy mofo's and criminals will still be able to get them?
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 12:14 PMJoined Mar 2004 - away - #4
ItAlY2BkLyN 230 heat pts230 space
avatar space
Mile Hi State of Mind
space
$16,264 | POWERFUL
It's a lot easier to blame gun control, than to blame a society that produces these types of individuals.

BTW, Biden or his family don't travel anywhere w/o armed guards with fully automatic weapons.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 01:20 PMJoined Jan 2004 - away - #5
LilEscobar 1 heat pts space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$1,040 | 3459009
Since the gun discussion began, has anyone in the government stated that they are going to take anyone's gun? Has anyone named that as an option??
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 01:23 PMJoined Feb 2006 - away - #6
killya 17 heat pts17 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$3,952 | 19814040
Originally Posted by LilEscobar
Since the gun discussion began, has anyone in the government stated that they are going to take anyone's gun? Has anyone named that as an option??
whats the point of them banning a.ssault rifles but not going after the millions of a.ssault rifles that the public already has? Makes no sense. There coming up with some plan. One of the senators proposed a legislation to ban all semi automatic weapons and magazine. I forgot her name. But shes working on passing it. There coming them
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 01:27 PMJoined Jan 2004 - away - #7
LilEscobar 1 heat pts space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$1,040 | 3459009
Originally Posted by killya
whats the point of them banning a.ssault rifles but not going after the millions of a.ssault rifles that the public already has? Makes no sense. There coming up with some plan. One of the senators proposed a legislation to ban all semi automatic weapons and magazine. I forgot her name. But shes working on passing it. There coming them
To ban the manufacturing of them right??? So like the previous ban, they will no longer be allowed to make them. Does not mean they are going to ask you to turn yours in.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 01:31 PMJoined Feb 2006 - away - #8
killya 17 heat pts17 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$3,952 | 19814040
Originally Posted by LilEscobar
To ban the manufacturing of them right??? So like the previous ban, they will no longer be allowed to make them. Does not mean they are going to ask you to turn yours in.
I agree, but honestly they keep hyping up these school shootings, im sure with the millions of a.ssault rifles in circulation they could easily get a hold of one...

Also if i remember correctly in the legislation being proposed she stated that all a.ssault rifle owners would have their name put into a database. Off the wall sh*t.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 01:37 PMJoined Jan 2004 - away - #9
LilEscobar 1 heat pts space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$1,040 | 3459009
Originally Posted by killya
I agree, but honestly they keep hyping up these school shootings, im sure with the millions of a.ssault rifles in circulation they could easily get a hold of one...

Also if i remember correctly in the legislation being proposed she stated that all a.ssault rifle owners would have their name put into a database. Off the wall sh*t.
On some real sh*t, the only thing thats going to happen is they are going to beef up the background checks, maybe do something regarding magazine size. If they want citizens to put their name in a database if you own an a.ssault rifle I dont see the problem. Whats wrong with that?
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 01:45 PMJoined Nov 2006 - away - #10
KFrizzle 285 heat pts285 space
avatar space
#JayCutlerSucks
space
$5,766 | POWERFUL
assault guns were not used at sandy hook, nor are they they guns used for murders... go look at the FBI stats...

why ban the guns that aren't the problem...

also stupid mag. size...
what the diff between 2 clips of 10/15 or 1 clip of 20/30...
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:11 PMJoined Feb 2006 - away - #11
killya 17 heat pts17 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$3,952 | 19814040
Originally Posted by KFrizzle
assault guns were not used at sandy hook, nor are they they guns used for murders... go look at the FBI stats...

why ban the guns that aren't the problem...

also stupid mag. size...
what the diff between 2 clips of 10/15 or 1 clip of 20/30...
they make people think that a 30 round mag will k!ll more people in a short amount of time without reloading then a 10 round or 15 round. Its all just a lie.


and piers morgan was on CBS this morning saying they have these "semi a.ssault rifles" that have 100 round mags. another blatant lie. There isn't even such thing for a automatic or semi automatic! They have a agenda.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:14 PMJoined Feb 2006 - away - #12
killya 17 heat pts17 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$3,952 | 19814040
Originally Posted by LilEscobar
On some real sh*t, the only thing thats going to happen is they are going to beef up the background checks, maybe do something regarding magazine size. If they want citizens to put their name in a database if you own an a.ssault rifle I dont see the problem. Whats wrong with that?
why put a.ssault rifle owners names in a database? How would they even do that? How would they know which people own a.ssault rifles? Them putting our names into a database just gives them excuses to take our rifles sometime down the line if they decide not to physically do it now


overall it just really does not look good for responsible gun owners.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:16 PMJoined Nov 2006 - away - #13
KFrizzle 285 heat pts285 space
avatar space
#JayCutlerSucks
space
$5,766 | POWERFUL
Originally Posted by killya
why put a.ssault rifle owners names in a database? How would they even do that? How would they know which people own a.ssault rifles? Them putting our names into a database just gives them excuses to take our rifles sometime down the line if they decide not to physically do it now
overall it just really does not look good for responsible gun owners.

Last year Canada ended its national long gun registry, a national database of every rifle and shotgun in the country that was supposed to help police track the movement of and sale of weapons. When it was introduced twenty years ago critics said the registration of firearms would eventually lead to confiscation, a criticism dismissed as ridiculous, yet that’s what happened and more right up until its dismantling.

Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:17 PMJoined Jan 2005 - on now - #14
StateProperty88 28 heat pts28 space
avatar space
Goodwill is the Monarch
space
$33,913 | POWERFUL
Originally Posted by killya
whats the point of them banning a.ssault rifles but not going after the millions of a.ssault rifles that the public already has? Makes no sense. There coming up with some plan. One of the senators proposed a legislation to ban all semi automatic weapons and magazine. I forgot her name. But shes working on passing it. There coming them
but will ii still be able to get a gun if i want one?
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:18 PMJoined Nov 2006 - away - #15
KFrizzle 285 heat pts285 space
avatar space
#JayCutlerSucks
space
$5,766 | POWERFUL
Side thought:

If the rightwing got together and decided too many people were dying because of abortion in this country and said that they were looking at ways to curb abortion, and that one of the things that they were thinking of doing was using executive orders on abortion, what do you think your reaction would be?

"Oh, yeah, this abortion, it's k!lling too many kids. Look at numbers!
Over a million kids are dead every year because of abortion, and we've got to stop this, and we're looking at any number of ways to stop it, and one of the things we're looking at is an executive order."
Can you imagine what you guys at CNN, NBC, CBS would be doing?
"You can't do that! You can't do that! You can't do that! Abortion's protected by the Constitution. You can't do that."
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:29 PMJoined Mar 2004 - away - #16
ItAlY2BkLyN 230 heat pts230 space
avatar space
Mile Hi State of Mind
space
$16,264 | POWERFUL
Originally Posted by killya
they make people think that a 30 round mag will k!ll more people in a short amount of time without reloading then a 10 round or 15 round. Its all just a lie.


and piers morgan was on CBS this morning saying they have these "semi a.ssault rifles" that have 100 round mags. another blatant lie. There isn't even such thing for a automatic or semi automatic! They have a agenda.
yes there is


Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:31 PMJoined Mar 2004 - away - #17
ItAlY2BkLyN 230 heat pts230 space
avatar space
Mile Hi State of Mind
space
$16,264 | POWERFUL




Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:40 PMJoined Feb 2006 - away - #18
killya 17 heat pts17 space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$3,952 | 19814040
Originally Posted by ItAlY2BkLyN
yes there is


theres no need for that
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 02:47 PMJoined Mar 2004 - away - #19
ItAlY2BkLyN 230 heat pts230 space
avatar space
Mile Hi State of Mind
space
$16,264 | POWERFUL
Originally Posted by killya
theres no need for that
agreed. I think a 100rd drum should be classified under an FFL like silencers, launchers, explosives, etc.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-10-2013, 03:26 PMJoined Jan 2004 - away - #20
LilEscobar 1 heat pts space
avatar space
Senior Member
space
$1,040 | 3459009
Originally Posted by KFrizzle
Hasnt led to it in canada
Reply With Quote
 

Home > all sections > BX Daily Bugle
  
    
          join bx


 




that hot ish yesterday


most viewed right now
48 viewing
Image inside Kylie Jenner Posts Her 'Raciest B1kini Pictures Ye..
108 comments
@eyecandy
most viewed right now
38 viewing
Image inside The Internet Already Making A Mockery Out Of Jay Z..
345 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
32 viewing
Hov cuts Tidal Premium Subscription in half  
174 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
30 viewing
NFL The best rookie wideout EVER?  
36 comments
@sports
most viewed right now
18 viewing
Image inside An Early Look at New Air Jordans Releasing This Su..
53 comments
@gear
most viewed right now
17 viewing
Video inside Mortal Kombat X: First 25 Minutes of Gameplay
67 comments
@games
most viewed right now
15 viewing
Video inside Michel'le Says Dr. Dre Shot At Her & Bullet Missed ..
83 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
13 viewing
Image inside how you feel bout Dej Loaf?  
72 comments
@eyecandy
most viewed right now
12 viewing
TERRENCE HOWARD'S EX-WIFE Move Over, Cookie ... I'M TAKING..
59 comments
@movies

^
contact us   |   bx@twitter   |   bx@facebook   |   privacy   |   search   |  © BX 1998-end of time