Aug 8 - Son does 8 years, Dad does 2. Society Lost

they're bringing him up on first degree murk charges though [pic]

Cant charge murk if the kid didnt die, he must have !!ed him up pretty bad though, Im thinking he burned him up pretty tough.

Im really confused on the title and what Im reading...

Summary of Title: Son did 8 yrs in a hospital in a comma while dad only did 2yrs in prison


son died last yr so now they bringing new charges up on pops for murk

Terrible thread title. He is gettin charged with first degree murk(felony murk rule). The hell is the issue? He is gettin either life or [rip].

Again, the hell is the problem?

What did he do to the boy?

Cant charge murk if the kid didnt die, he must have !!ed him up pretty bad though, Im thinking he burned him up pretty tough.

this just proves that you are the !!in idiot that i thought you were.[pic]

Okay so what did the man do the boy genius...........cause the article didn't mention what type of abuse took place............

As long as the boy was alive he could not be convicted of murk now the boy is dead he is charged with murk................its not me dude..........your comprehension skills are lacking behind, and you need a serious !!ing upgrade...........cause you cant comprehend worth a damn.

mf'er it was child abuse, i dont see what your question is.

So you mean to tell me you think the dad only doing 2 years in prison for beating his son into a coma was enough?

its clear that you are the one lacking in the comprehension skills dip!!

Okay so what did the man do the boy genius...........cause the article didn't mention what type of abuse took place............

As long as the boy was alive he could not be convicted of murk now the boy is dead he is charged with murk................its not me dude..........your comprehension skills are lacking behind, and you need a serious !!ing upgrade...........cause you cant comprehend worth a damn.

if the boy died 8 years later as a result of whatever the dad did though, I can see a jury charging him with murk.

what would you call how he died, natural causes? [pic]

Smh.......child abuse does necessarily mean beating a child dumba#s. It could mean physical and both mental abuse. And there is no clear indication what type of physical abuse landed the boy in a hospital.


And again we have one of these moments where you see something that was NEVER stated..."
So you mean to tell me you think the dad only doing 2 years in prison for beating his son into a coma was enough?"....did I say that? What the !! is wrong with you dude, what goes through your head when you read and make these type statements? In no way that even remotely indicated.........goddamn your dumb dude.

Huh? I agree with the charges, I just want to know wtf happened to the boy.........what exactly did the man do to the little boy.

well i have never heard of a parent mind !!ing a kid into a coma so i would think that common sense(which you clearly have none) that the dad put a pretty tough beating on the kid.

Regardless of the kid not being dead yet and therefore the dad didnt get a murk conviction, you mean to tell me you still dont see that there is something wrong with him only doing 2 years?