This is BX @ Boxden.com


Top Companies Paid 9% U.S. Tax Rate On Average (video)


 Top Companies Paid 9% U.S. Tax Rate On Average (video)
By JohnDoe - 08-10-2012, 03:42 PM - Boxden > The Money Spot (finance/careers)


Video inside Top Companies Paid 9% U.S. Tax Rate On Average - YouTube


share this topic »   Share this on Twitter Share this on Facebook

5 comments for "Top Companies Paid 9% U.S. Tax Rate On Average (video)"


 08-11-2012, 08:37 PMaway - #2
Jim Gunther
They should pay nothing. Corporate taxes hurt the economy...ALL top economist agree to this. Corporate tax is only in place as a political gesture to pander to the poor voters to give them a false perception of "fairness".

Tax code should be rewritten to eliminate corporate taxes and to minimize loopholes that hide personal income in businesses.
 08-11-2012, 10:21 PMaway - #3
CentsCuZ
Corporations don't pay taxes regardless, they simply raise the cost of their products and pass the costs to the customers. And when they get to a point where they can't do that and still compete, they move to another jurisdiction.
 08-11-2012, 11:18 PMaway - #4
hockeythug
not this nonsense again [pic]
 08-12-2012, 09:59 AMaway - #5
Jim Gunther
Originally Posted by CentsCuZ
Corporations don't pay taxes regardless, they simply raise the cost of their products and pass the costs to the customers. And when they get to a point where they can't do that and still compete, they move to another jurisdiction.
If this is what you've chosen to believe to help fuel the unwarranted hate you have for corporations you keep going with this, but I'd like to point out to others some flawed[..]umptions in your statement.

For 99% of corporations, attempting to "simply raise the cost of their products to pass all tax costs to their customers" would quickly result in relinquishing a critical portion of their market share to competition. "Moving to another jurisdiction" could potentially place the corporation under a less costly tax code, but the resulting disentegration of their customer base along with the HUGE costs of moving a corporation would almost guarantee a complete business failure. Penalties from moving could be reduced, but this would either require a corporation to abandon their company name (along with their name equity) or a complete and immediate shutdown of operations in the state they're moving from.

The only companies that have the brand loyalty and loose cash to possibly survive such an irresponsible decision (Apple, Google, etc) have such large headquarters that moving while avoiding liquidation or foreigner tax penalties (i.e. moving under the scenerios I previously stated) would result in epic facilitory abandonment that would raise all types of ethical flags and probably result in lawsuits. The other companies that could survive this are essentially monopolies and have their product prices fixed...and they barely pay taxes ever.

In this fantasy, how many times could a company jump jurisdictions? Wouldn't they eventually land in the bottom taxed area? It's just such a fictional, illogical and totally irresponsible opinion man. I understand the desire to rip "Big Companies" but be more informed.
 08-12-2012, 02:55 PMaway - #6
CentsCuZ
Originally Posted by Jim Gunther
If this is what you've chosen to believe to help fuel the unwarranted hate you have for corporations you keep going with this, but I'd like to point out to others some flawed[..]umptions in your statement.

For 99% of corporations, attempting to "simply raise the cost of their products to pass all tax costs to their customers" would quickly result in relinquishing a critical portion of their market share to competition. "Moving to another jurisdiction" could potentially place the corporation under a less costly tax code, but the resulting disentegration of their customer base along with the HUGE costs of moving a corporation would almost guarantee a complete business failure. Penalties from moving could be reduced, but this would either require a corporation to abandon their company name (along with their name equity) or a complete and immediate shutdown of operations in the state they're moving from.

The only companies that have the brand loyalty and loose cash to possibly survive such an irresponsible decision (Apple, Google, etc) have such large headquarters that moving while avoiding liquidation or foreigner tax penalties (i.e. moving under the scenerios I previously stated) would result in epic facilitory abandonment that would raise all types of ethical flags and probably result in lawsuits. The other companies that could survive this are essentially monopolies and have their product prices fixed...and they barely pay taxes ever.

In this fantasy, how many times could a company jump jurisdictions? Wouldn't they eventually land in the bottom taxed area? It's just such a fictional, illogical and totally irresponsible opinion man. I understand the desire to rip "Big Companies" but be more informed.
Wow, dude, reach much? Nothing that I said even slightly insinuated a disdain for corporations. And I wasn't even responding to what you said, I was responding to the article, hence the reason why I didn't quote you. I actually agree with you that corporate taxes shouldn't even exist, mainly for the reason I stated though--corporations don't pay taxes, their customers and shareholders do.

How many times could/have companies jumped jurisdictions? Literally THOUSANDS of the biggest corporations in this country have moved either their headquarters or entire divisions of their companies overseas and suffered almost zero backlash in terms of sales. Google and Apple, as you stated, have "offices--aka mailboxes" , but so do thousands of other sizable corporations. The result is, the earnings are those of foreign divisions of the company which are not subject to the U.S. taxcode. The problem with that though is that they build up billions of dollars in foreign currencies that they must subject to U.S. taxes if they choose to repatriate. Instead, they lobby year after year for a tax holiday and will usually get one after ten or so years of persistence.

And I'm going to keep it strictly taxes, I wont even talk about all the companies that have moved their labor overseas to avoid U.S. regulation and having to match social security, etc.
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 

Go Back   Boxden.Com - Stay First. Follow BX. > BX Table Of Contents > The Money Spot (finance/careers)
    
         
Mark Forums Read

 



Latest hot topics on fire the past 48 hrs
Peterson-Matthysse//Alexander-Purdy[5-18-13][SHOWTIME]
78 comments
MMA UFC on FX: Belfort vs Rockhold Official Discussion Thread
165 comments
NBA Bobcats Begin Process Of Changing Name Back To Hornets
71 comments
 NBA Dwyane Wade Takes His Biggest Groupie To Prom (pic)
New reply 2 minutes ago - 75 comments - by joshdogg26
 NFL Nfl Rookies In New Digs (pics)
New reply 6 minutes ago - 53 comments - by Got Cheeve?
  What Hip Hop Slang Is Exclusive To You City Or Hood
New reply 3 minutes ago - 51 comments - by SavageMitten
 Article inside Luke Cage - Dwayne "the Rock" Johnson Contin...
New reply 12 minutes ago - 61 comments - by bigscore
 Video inside Kanye West's Face Randomly Appearing On A Brooklyn Wal...
New reply 3 minutes ago - 393 comments - by PotheadFocker
  Sony Possible Confirms Ps 4 Price Then Removed Post
New reply 17 minutes ago - 61 comments - by Da Ill One
 Video inside Stacy Dash Out Here Struggling
New reply 6 minutes ago - 90 comments - by illmatic826
 Image(s) inside No More Fruit Loops For Me
New reply 24 minutes ago - 144 comments - by blaznfor20

Join us on Facebook. Check out the BX fan page and hit the Like button. Follow BX on Twitter to get instant hot topic alerts. Enter your email address below and receive a daily hot topic newsletter.
5,304 fans of BX and 1 new today 4,287 following and 4 new today

 


hot topic blog   »    hip-hop   |   sports   |   movies   |   games   |   news   |   wild'ish   |   gear   |   eyecandy   |   rides   |   tech

contact us   |   mobile   |   sitemap   |   privacy statement

© Boxden.com. 1998 - end of time.