Watch this. Still think Pacquiao was robbed? (video)

Here is what the publisher of the video had to say in his description ..


Published on Jun 18, 2012 by PrecisePuncher

Read the description, lest you chance making a fool of yourself commenting.

This video IS NOT about who won the fight, nor is it really about the fight. Read the title.

In order to keep the video within 15 minutes, I had to cut corners. If you feel the action moves too fast, pause, rewind, replay. Much of what I wanted to include had to be scrapped as well.

I'd like you to pay attention not just to the action, but what the commentators say. When HBO constantly repeated "Pacquiao", and they did that A LOT, they made some viewers subconsciously favor Manny and concentrate on the things that Pacquiao is doing. Note how they keep talking about Pacquiao's power, his musculature or status, oftentimes when Bradley is doing good work. Then, they also degrade Bradley's work by either ignoring it or straight talking !!. Throw in all the bogus shot calls, Ledderman scorecards, crowd reaction, and what you have is an attempt to sway the viewer. If you don't believe TV got people mind controlled, then you also probably still think you live in a free country or that you are doing something noble by joining the military. For example...

The point is not to show that all of Bradley's shots were clean and powerful, although some were. The point is to show how the HBO team would call Pacquiao's complete misses as scoring and even hurtful shots, all the while ignoring Bradley's partial shots and clean connects. Isn't a partially blocked jab from Bradley is a more effective shot than some of Pacquiao's "straight left hands"? But I guess if you call Pacquiao's misses as clean shots, your goal is not to be fair or truthful, is it?

Lastly, how is it that Pacquiao supposedly landed all these quality shots, yet Bradley's face looked almost untouched? Wouldn't all these straight left hands show like they did on every other opponent? Anyone?

If you disagree and believe that Pacquiao did land a lot of clean shots and HBO was fair, please submit a video response. If want your argument to be more than mere OPINION, I guess you're gonna have to do some work, huh? Talk is cheap.

And for the record, I had Pacquiao winning a close fight that could've gone either way.

Thanks for watching.

[pic]

Even Bradley didn't think he won. !! this garbage. Boxing is corrupt as hell.

There's no reason 60-70 year olds should be judging anything. Them niccas minds are too slow to keep up with the speed of a professional boxer's punches

[pic]

Bradley denies telling Arum he couldn't beat Pacquiao; 'Why would I say that?'



source....

[pic]

Biased heavily edited video. Nice try

What are you so mad about !!? Who kicked your ball over the fence chump. If you didnt see the fight just say it and sit down and STFU!!! You pillow biting princess. [pic]

i watched the fight.. i ws sayin the same !! about hbo callin all of pacs but none of bradleys moments

i did think pac won but afer watchin this, i see hbo !!ed my perception up